The American Civil Liberties Union, once a supporter of legislation in favor of government transparency, recently did a 180. In reality, they are seriously concerned about the political indoctrination and sexual grooming that too many schools are partaking in. Also, the ongoing conflation of transparency and censorship is a redder-than-red herring.Įven civil rights organizations have boarded the anti-transparency train. Parents who send their children to public schools are not trying to undermine them. Maggie Nurrenbern, who called the proposal “an attempt to undermine public education.” ![]() She states that since schools don’t interfere with a child’s life at home, parents should butt out at school.Īt the same time, NBC News alerts us that “conservative activists want schools to post lesson plans online, but free speech advocates warn such policies could lead to more censorship in K-12 schools.” NBC national reporter Tyler Kingkade adds, “Some of the proposals under consideration in state legislatures, including a bill in Missouri, would require schools to post all teacher training materials online, in addition to descriptions of what is taught.” The bill has drawn criticism from Democrats, including state Rep. In a recent piece, she referred to parents as “ household tyrants,” and insists that the call for parental transparency is a wacko Christian Republican plot. New York Magazine writer Sarah Jones is certainly on the anti-transparency bandwagon. Owen Jackman, a California Teachers Association state council delegate and teacher in the Sacramento City Unified School District, equated parents who advocate for their kids at school board meetings to “ storm troopers.” Jackman joked that he has “a reason to be concerned about the appropriateness of what your child is learning outside of school.” He went on to request that parents “provide a play-by-play of the television shows their kids watch, the social media they use, swear words and racial epithets their kids hear each day, the books being read to them, and activities they will participate in for the remainder of the year.” Jackman seems to think he shares parenting responsibilities with mom and dad. Unions in other states are fighting similar battles.Īdditionally, a teacher union official recently wrote a sarcastic post on Facebook, mocking parents’ calls for transparency, suggesting that they butt out of school affairs. In Utah, the state teachers union is trying to fend off HB 234, a bill that would require educators to disclose what they are teaching. In the Hoosier State, the Indiana State Teachers Association is currently battling against House Bill 1134, which would require teachers to post school curricula online. In 2021, a mother was sued by the Rhode Island state affiliate of the National Education Association after she made a public records request to find out exactly what her daughter was going to be taught in kindergarten. So, who could possibly be against transparency? First and foremost, the teachers unions. ![]() As reported by Christopher Rufo, lawmakers in 19 states have introduced bills that require curriculum transparency. With the revelation that too many of government-run k-12 schools have turned into indoctrination mills, there is now pushback from parents. You might think the same mentality would be in place for what goes into our minds, especially those of children, but unfortunately that has become a very contentious issue. No one has an issue with that because it’s important to know what we put into our bodies. The FDA insists that every last ingredient of the heavily processed food is listed on the package label. This article was originally posted on For Kids & Country.Īs states and school boards battle over school curricula, the least we can do is keep parents informed about what their kids are learning.īologna.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |