Apple do indeed have form in this area too, battery/processor throttling springs to mind. The links I shared illustrate Google and Mozilla doing things without asking or informing the user. Thinking the world at large knows, cares, and can make "informed choices" about the browser engines used throughout their phone apps is delusional.Īlso, there's nothing "subjective" about whether all smartphone users are web developers, and therefore happen to care about browser engines.Īnd they tell you this is happening. I care about their opinion and their opinion was delusional. I don't know or care who said the above opinion. Strawman is another one that most people love to say, while having no clue what it means. The fact that despite that you constantly hear people complaining about "ad hominem" online is just that much funnier. If they said "I have a history of delusions" and I said "therefore your opinion has no merit", that's ad hominem. It's in fact very hard to commit ad hominem against an anonymous person online who has said nothing about themselves. Ad hominem would be disregarding an opinion not by discussing the opinion, but by discarding the opinion based on WHO said it. You have it backwards.Īd hominem doesn't mean "don't say bad words about me and my opinions". I think the Web being such a gigantic standard that only one or two big megacorporations has the chance to make a browser engine for is much worse for the open web, than Safari lagging a few years behind. I make a point of supporting Firefox on my Windows devices (and it's my back-up browser for Mac as well). It's clear that they're a few years behind on a lot of things, but if Apple really tried Firefox could be the one browser that was always behind, and since nobody is really encourage to use it by any big corporation, it could easily die. How big should the collection of web standards be? Maybe it's come to a point where it's good that a browser holds back a bit? I think that makes it easier for Firefox to keep up with the common standard. I'm personally just interested in relatively dumb websites, and the only features that could improve the experience is those that improve speed (so I did see some features on the list I wish Safari added, but not many).Īnd I'm not sure that approach is even sustainable in the long term. It doesn't seem to me that users are demanding ever more features in their browser. > If we get there, the whole browser ecosystem collapses, and the open web is in very serious trouble. So, if you consider "Web" what Google is pushing on now, it's clear Safari is not pushing forward in that ecosystem.īut none of them do it for the sake of their users, but their ecosystems I don't think is a question of what the companies want, but what do their users use.Īs long as Safari is the dominant browser in Apple's ecosystem, they will make sure you can max out the value received through other ways that align more with their vision and proprietary APIs. Google with Flutter (towards cross-platform API UI dominance) and so on. From Apple moving Metal forward instead of Vulkan, Microsoft with Directx12. This kind of API strategies are everywhere the software touches. They deliver value through their macOS/iOS SDKs, which are ecosystems they fully own.Īpple moves Safari as minimal as possible (regarding new APIs added) to make sure people can still browse, but while still incentivizing their own routes. However, Apple argument is not about delivering value to their users via a browser, since that's an ecosystem they don't control. there is obviously a burden on what is needed to be implemented for a browser in 2020 vs what was necessary 10 years ago. The only way to be up to date with all those changes is power (operating money).įirefox is barely able to catch up with all the updates to the standards. However, they do it with the main propose of governing the ecosystem where those APIs are pushed (the web). Of course, they have operating power to move forward 300 APIs at the same time. Google Chrome is Google's master plan to remove responsibility from the Operating System and put it into their full control.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |